Do The Jews Run The World?

From amidst this internet age in which we’re presently living, where information is exchanged voluminously, there’s been a fairly widespread awakening occurring, sometimes called the “truth movement”, where people are becoming increasingly aware that ‘the game is rigged’ so to speak, and that there are extremely wealthy individuals and private interest groups who have great pull in world affairs, and that typically things don’t actually operate as they appear to on the surface.

When one first tumbles down the proverbial rabbit hole of “conspiracy theories” they will find most common puppet masters are said to be ‘The Deep State’, ‘The Elite’, ‘The Powers That Be’, ‘The Globalists’, ‘The Bankers’, The Rockefellers’, ‘The Illuminati’, ‘The Freemasons’, ‘The Bilderberg Group’, ‘Skull & Bones’, ‘The Trilateral Commission’, ‘The Clube of Rome’, ‘The United Nations’, ‘The Crown’, ‘The Saudis’, ‘The Rothschilds’, ‘The Zionists’, ‘Committee of 300’, ‘The Vatican’ (and it’s various knighthoods such as Opus Dei, the Knights Templar, The Knights of Malta, The Knights of Columbus, the Jesuit Order), the Jews, etc. When one realizes all these tentacles to this beast, the real question becomes who’s really at the top of the hierarchical pyramid? There must a central power for such a perpetual harmony in purpose, and that’s resulted in such consistent international trends, especially in the last century, in spite of so many subsidiaries.

Today, especially with the rise of the QAnon movment, which has highlighted role of the Rothschilds and George Soros behind the scenes of current events, the notion that the Jews are ultimately the ones behind the new world order has become the dominant theory in the “truth movement”. And reasonably so when considers since there are a ton of Jews in places of power, such as the aforementioned, Steven Mnuchin’s (US Secretary of the Treasury), Ben Bernanke’s (former chairman of the US Federal Reserve), Bernie Madoff’s (Former American market maker, investment advisor and financier), Jared Kushner’s (Senior Advisor to the President of the US), Harvey Weinstein’s (Hollywood Mogul), Steven Spielberg’s (American filmmaker), and indeed the Rothschild family Dynasy, the Kissinger’s, the Soros’, and many more. According to this person’s research, in 2011, 28 of 43 directors on the Council of Foreign Relations were Jewish (that’s 65%).

But in the spirit of objectivity, and true investigative journalism, the question must at least be asked be, is it possible the Jewish prominence in positions of power could be more dynamic than it appears on the surface? Like for instance, is it possible that while they are seeking power and prominence for their own ends, they’ve ultimately been allowed to to occupy these positions by even more powerful and secret societies, to the chief end that the the real conspirators can remain undetected, while the Jews, another enemy of theirs (i.e. the enemies of the secret societies) are conveniently propped up to take the fall? Has such a ruse ever been known to have happened before, historically speaking? As it turns out it has. In the following exposition it will l be demonstrated through well documented historical facts, current events and finally, and most importantly, Bible prophecy: that the Jews are ultimately (as a whole), merely opportunistic pawns and scapegoats; and we will also explore how/why this has come to be.

Who are were the First Bankers, and who are the Rothschilds?

All around the world, in every civilized country, there exists foreign, private banks, that “manages the currency, money supply, and interest rates of a state or formal monetary union”, which are collectively known as central banks. The founding fathers of the US, for instance, knew that nations were commonly destroyed through such schemes (because if countries are borrowing money from a foreign institution they end up in debt to them, and thus subservient to them), and thus the government was framed so that only the US Congress to issue currency, as reflected in Article I, Section 8 of the constitution, and which, rather than worthless paper, had to be “gold and silver Coin”, as reflected in section 10 (It wasn’t until the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 that the United States ended up with a central bank). This is why “the bankers” are commonly fingered as the fount of the conspiracy, and then ultimately the jews, with one of the most prominent banking enterprises for early three centuries being the jewish Rothschild banking family. On the surface it would would seem case closed. But if one were to continue in their research, and ask some critical questions, for instance who were the first bankers, and how did a jewish family end up with such a german sounding name, and what does it mean? They’d find some interesting “bread crumbs”.

As it turns out, the first bankers were actually the knights templars of the roman catholic church, who’d make bank notes, which could later be exchanged, so that the faithful making pilgrimages to the holy land couldn’t be robbed their coinage. And as alluded to in the last paragraph, the name Rothschild is not actually Jewish, it is german. Given as a pseudonym, the name means “Red Shield”, and is reference to the shields of roman soldiers. So just as the “red shields” protected the roman soldiers, is it possible that the “rothschilds” bankers are the “shield” (i.e. scapegoats) of the church of rome? Fascinatingly enough they are admitted to being the guardians of the papal treasure on Pg. 497, Volume 10, of the 1916 Jewish Encyclopedia (I don’t want to belabor the point, but for tons of other quotes from a host of other authors elaborating on the papal/ Rothschild/banking connection just click here). And you will find in the photos and portraits of the Rothschilds they are in fact wearing papal knighthood medals of honor.

Now, because the Bible is the religious book of the Jews (the first half anyways, i.e. the old testament), and because based on my research it’s prophecies have demonstrated it to be a historically accurate and divinely inspired (regarding Old Testament Prophecies see here, here, here, here, or here, and for New Testament Prophecies, which are being fulfilled all around you, see here), it needs to at least be examined in our research of this subject, regardless of our personal faith or convictions, and thus it shall be also be quoted where relevant throughout this dissertation. In Deuteronomy chapters 27, 28 the Jews were given by God blessings (for obedience to Him) and cursings (for disonedience) since they were called by His name, to represent His character. Since Jesus is the Jewish Messiah, of the Jewish scriptures, the only Mediator between God and men (according to the evidence cited in the links in the last paragraph), those who are reject Him are under the curses of God, as he’s called all men everywhere to repent (Acts 17:30-31). This means that that the Jews who reject their Messiah are especially under the curse of God, having a special calling, and knowledge of the scriptures which Jesus fulfilled, and this is corroborated by Jesus and the other New Testament writers (Mt. 21:42-43; Acts 13:46; Mt. 23:37-38; Rom. 11).

And as it turns out, one finds in the Bible, regarding the subject of banking, a statement in harmony with the evidence presented above regarding the origin of banking and the Rothschild dynasty. One of the curses for disobedience was, “The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low.He shall lend to thee, and thou shalt not lend to him: he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail.“-Deut 28:43-44

What about Bolshevism and communism?

Another major reason that the Jews as a whole are blamed is because of the increasingly undeniable proliferation of leftist/socialist/communist ideals in western civilization today. These doctrines are most often associated with the Bolshevik revolution (a type of Marxism; most of the leaders indeed being of jewish descent, including Marx himself) and a document which contains doctrines that correspond to the Bolshevik Revolution known as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (Although as Leo Lehman in His Book Behind the Dictators points out, “of the seventeen members of the Council of ‘People’s Commissars of the Soviet government’ at that time, only one, Trotsky, was a Jew).

While it is true that Karl Marx was of Jewish ancestry, his doctrines were not his own. To begin, Marx was a Satanist (writing poems about striking a deal with satan; see also R. Wurmbrand, Marx and Satan; and more examples of Marx’s satanic musings here). You will also notice in his portraits that he often makes the “hidden hand” masonic gesture for the sign of the “Master of the Second Veil. And if you head over to my article titled New World Order: Conspiracy Theory or Historical Precedent? you will find several quotes proving that the masons are ultimately governed by the Jesuits and also that the according to Masonic authorities, the highest degreed masons do indeed worship Lucifer. It should also be noted that the pro-communist Socialist Revolutionary Saul Alinsky dedicated his book (see Pg. iv), Rules for Radicals to Lucifer, writing, “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins— or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom —Lucifer”. And as it turns out, it was the Roman Catholic Priest John Joseph Egan who inspired him to write the book.

Additionally, Marx was was educated for 5 Years at the Jesuit High School of Trier, and then later was tutored by the then Superior General of the Society of Jesus, named Peter Jan Beckx (do find on page, “Father Beck”). In fact, while often concealed, you will find the jesuits behind every communist (and fascist). For instance Joseph Stalin, one of the brutalist communists and mass murders the world has ever seen, was in league with the jesuit priest Edmund Walsh. In fact Stalin even stated that the reason he became a marxist was “Jesuistic repression and the martinet intolerance of the Orthodox seminary where I spent some years”…. and that the jesuits are “systematic and persevering in working to achieve their…ends.”. Clearly Stalin was aware that the jesuits controlled the “Orthodox” seminary he attended (and since the the Jesuits had a safe haven in Russia since when they were surpressed as an order dating back to Catherine the Great, no wonder). And so no wonder Stalin we find Stalin was publiclly addressed as “Father”, the title given to priests.

As it turns out, the credo underlying socialism and communism, “social justice” actually has its origins with another jesuit priest, Luigi Taparelli d’Azeglio, specifically in his Saggio Teoretico di Dritto Naturale Appoggiato sul Fatto Opera, published in 1843, 74 years before the Bolshevik Revolution. Here it is admitted from an evident communist apologist, in an occupational therapy journal, from Western Michigan University, on Pg. 3 we read:

“The concept of social justice has been addressed by some of the greatest minds in Western civilization, including Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, Locke, Hume, Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, Marx, Mill, and Rawls. The term social justice began to appear in the literature during the 1840s. A Jesuit priest, Taparelli d’Azeglio, coined the term. “Justice,” he argued, “is the habitual inclination to level or balance accounts. Distributive justice equalizes proportions in the common good”

But let’s really drive the point home:

“Bolshevism is not an accident. It is not without reason that the Soviet historians open their accounts of Communism with Thomas More. The spiritual godfathers of Bolshevism in the sixteenth century are as amazing as that century itself; More, Calvin, Loyola, and Ivan the Terrible – all contemporaries….While the Bolshevist Party in its relation to the government greatly resembles the Calvinist pattern, the internal structure of that party is a replica of Loyola’s Jesuit Society. Loyola conceived the Church to be in a state of war, and Lenin considered Society to be in a state of war. Loyola built his organization upon the principles of military discipline, of total abnegation on the part of those who joined his society, of an intricate system of espionage from which not even the supreme general was exempt. His teachings of obedience and his hierarchial order are closely reproduced within the Bolshevist Party. The Jesuit ethics of the end justifying the means recur frequently in the catechism of Leninism.”-Stalin, by Issac Levine, 1933, Pg. 26

So now that we’ve uncovered the jesuit hand in socialist-communism, we’ve still yet to reach its origins, let us now consider how communism as a philosophy was indeed perfected with the Roman Catholic “Saint” Thomas More’s Utopia (1516), and actually goes back even further the 3rd century Catholic Church Fathers:

“People are re-distributed around the households and towns to keep numbers even…There is no private property on Utopia, with goods being stored in warehouses and people requesting what they need….All able-bodied citizens must work; thus unemployment is eradicated…the working day can be minimized…all other citizens, however, are encouraged to apply themselves to learning in their leisure time….Slavery is a feature of Utopian life and it is reported that every household has two slaves. …Other significant innovations of Utopia include: a welfare state with free hospitals, euthanasia permissible by the state.”

But as we see from this Article published by Jesuit Marquette Univesrity’s Review, titled, The Problem with Private Property According to St. Thomas Aquinas, they actually go back even further:

“The rich man shall give support to the poor man”-Pope Celment I, Epist. 1 ad Corinthios 38, PG 1.284 (AD 35-99)
“If everything which friends possess belongs to them in common,and if man is the friend of God, then it follows that everythingbelongs to men, because everything belongs to God. And thuseverything belongs in common to the two friends, to God and toman.”-Clement of Alexandria (Church Father), Cohortatio ad gentes 12, PG 8,244-246.(AD 140-215)“We who are one both in soul and spirit do not doubt that allthings are common to all… except our wifes”-Tertullian (Church Father), Apologeticus adversuas gentes pro Christianos (or, Apologeticum) 39, PL1.534-535 (AD 155-220)“We must avoid all property, as we should avoid an enemy: fleeit as we would flee before a bandit: and fear it as we wouldfear a sword or poison”-St. Cyprian (Church Father), De lapsis 35, PL 4.493.(AD 210-258)“As individuals we possess what actually belongs to the many:and as individuals we usurp what really should be the commonpossession of all”-St. Basil of Caesarea (Church Father), PG 31.303-328, especially id. at 8, PG 31.325-326. (AD 330-379)
“should you possess more than you absolutely need in order tofeed and clothe yourself, then you must give away the excess.”-St. Jerome (Church Father), Epistola 120 ad Hedibiam 1, PL 22.985 (AD 342-420)“If we admit of property in order to meet our needs, we do thisnot in order that we may have property or possessions, butsolely in order that the poor among us may have something. Forwe are so to speak the trustees of the property and the rightsof the poor…”-St. Augustine (Church Father), Epist. 185 ad Bonifaciun 9.36, PL 33.809 (AD 354-430)

“According to the natural law, all things belong to all men in common…”-Decretumn Gratiani (Canon Law), Decretumn 7, part 1 (AD 1140)

“the possession of all thing in common… [is] said to be of the natural law, because the distinction of possessions . ..[was]not brought in by nature, but [was] devised by human reason…. “-St Thomas Aquinas (Church Father), Summa Theologica, at 12, quaest. 94, art. 5, ad 3 (AD 1485)

And these principles laid out therein were then put into practice in the 17th century, when Jesuits had created communist states such as in Paraguay, where they had the Guarani Natives making clocks, violins, farming the herb Yerba Mate, etc. living in communes, in accordance to (what’d become) the marxist credo, “each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” Each little community, called severally “reductions” (communes) were absolutely identical in their layout, government, etc. The Indians were kept in universal equality (just above poverty), while the jesuits made a fortune.

In A vanished Arcadia; being some account of the Jesuits in Paraguay, 1607 to 1767 by R.B. Cunninghame Graham, 1901, pgs. 203, 277, 279-280, 283-285, we read:

“It will be seen that the communism of the missions was of a limited character, and, though the land was cultivated by the labour of the community, that the products were administered by the Jesuits alone…communism is against the laws of Heaven and of man ; that the Indians in their semi-communism were really slaves, the industrious working for the idle, and so forth ; that their clothes were scanty…Jesuits for keeping the Indians mewed up from intercourse with the outside world… [Brabo writes] It is not convenient to leave them (the Indians) entire liberty…the sentiment of property was very weak amongst the Indians…once their faulty system was removed, the Indians would soon become what he judged civilized, and hold their own with those around them, though of another race and blood….the [roman catholic jesuit] priests followed the example of their prototypes Hofni and Phineas, went about armed, took Indian mistresses, and neglected all religious duties treating the Indians after the fashion of the Spaniards in the settlements….The Indian population had almost disappeared within the space of eight-and-twenty years”

In R.W. Thompson’s Footprints of the Jesuits, 1894, we read regarding the Paraguayan reductions:

“…universal equality prevailed. The principles of socialism or communism—very much as now understood —governed all the Reductions. Everything necessary to the material comfort and prosperity of the Indians was in common. Each family had a portion of land set apart for cultivation. They also learned trades, and many of them, both men and women, became experts. But the earnings of the whole were deposited in common storehouses at each Reduction, and distributed by the Jesuits in such portions to each individual as necessity required. . . . Suffrage was universal, but ‘the sanction of the Jesuits was necessary to the validity of the election…to sum up the whole without further detail, the indians were regarded as minors under guardianship, and in this condition they remained for 150 years, without the possibility of social and national development. They were saved it is true from the miseries of Portuguese slavery, but kept in such a condition of inferiority and vassalage as unfitted them for independent citizenship. Their limbs were unchained; but their minds were “cabined, cribbed, confined,” within bounds too narrow for matured thought, sentiment, or reason.”-Pg. 174-175, 177. For much more on history of the Jesuits in paraguay and the roman catholic origin of communism, see Chapter 2 Of Edmund Paris’ Secret History of the Jesuits, and especially Chapter 12 of Eric Jon Phelps Vatican Assassins, etc.

Literally, every single communist leader (just like every single Fascist leader), was being advised by a Jesuit priest. For example Jesuit Priest Teilhard de Chardin and Mao Tse Dung of Communist China. From Pgs. 82-83 of Ursla King’s Towards a new Mysticism (1980) we read:

“Between 1933-36, Teilhard counted among his friends Edgar Snow, the journalist and famous author of Red Star Over China. According to Helen Snow, Teilhard was one of the first Westerners to learn about the experience on which this book is based, namely Snow’s visit to Mao Tse-Tung and the Chinese communist movement in 1936. Supporting evidence for this comes from another member of the Peking circle who writes that Edgar Snow, on his return from visiting the communist headquarters in Yenan, in Western China, “brought photographs and information about the life and conditions there. As he was one of the first journalists to visit the Communists his reports were of the the greatest value, and Pere Teilhard questioned him from every angle as this new phenomenon was of much interest to him, as were all large manifestations of human energy.” Apparently Teilhard read the Red Star over China with great fascination and together with the Snows they discussed ‘the new controversial subjects – fascism, Marxism, socialism, communism, and isms for which we had not even any common language then’. Throguh Mao Tse-Tung’s Marxism, an element of Western thought and ethics reached for the first time the majority of Chinese villagers never before touched by Western missionary influence. In Helen Snow’s opinion, Mao Tse-Tung’s influence and presence, more than anything else, were an example of Teilhard’s thesis of the evolution of man. Apparently, Mrs. Snow told Mao personally in 1937 about Teilhard’s own vision and thought…the story illustrates that Teilhard knew more about the rising forces of communism in China than one would generally suspect. He had for a long time been aware of the compelling attraction of Marxism and many of his essays refer to the inner strength and activating power of the Marxist belief in the development of man and the world. He shared this belief to a great extent but he criticized it for its lack of transcendence.”

Now, before we deal with the so-called Protocols of the Learned Elder’s of Zion, here’s a couple of contempary examples to further establish that communism is ultimately catholic, and that her doctrines have not changed:

Here’s a clip of two Nuns and, and here two Jesuit priests, admitting they practice a form of communism.

Catholic bishop, Chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences praises the communist Chinese regime as best implementer of ‘Catholic Social Doctrine’

AMERICA – The Jesuit Magazine: The Catholic Case for Communism: “priests like Herbert McCabe, O.P., Ernesto and Fernando Cardenal, S.J., Frei Betto, O.P., Camilo Torres and many other Catholics—members of the clergy, religious and laypeople—have been inspired by communists and in many places contributed to communist and communist-influenced movements as members. Some still do—for example in the Philippines, where the “Christians for National Liberation,” an activist group first organized by nuns, priests and exploited Christians, are politically housed within the National Democratic Front, a coalition of movements that includes a strong communist thread currently fighting the far-right authoritarian leader Rodrigo Duterte.”

AMERICA – The Jesuit Magazine: Yes, democratic socialism is compatible with Catholic social teaching

Pope receives Communist Hammer and Sickle Crucifix Bolivian President Evo Morales

Pope Francis Wears Hammer & Sickle Crucifix, acknowledges Jesuit Origin of Communism

[communism of St. Thomas Aquinas]

Jewish or Jesuit Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion?

The existence of this document is ultimately the root cause of why so many today believe the jews are behind the destruction we’re witnessing in western civilization. Published in 1903 (well after the communism originating in and championed by the catholic church, as we covered in the previous section), the document outlines the a plan for world empire, the destruction of western civilization and Christianity (in actuality, what’s meant by the author(s) is specifically Protestant Christianity, and Protestant forms of government).

Upon surveying this document, the very first thing that should raise a red flag to the thinking person, is that throughout it’s entirety, it speaks in terms of “us Jews”, and “the GOYIM [that] will bow down before us”. It only takes a little common sense to realize that an author(s) of a document to overthrow every extant government, religion, world order, etc. would not be stupid enough to name themselves by name over and over again throughout the document, as obviously, in the event the document should be discovered (which is always a great possibility), it would result in their condemnation and a definite foiling of all their ambitions. The next thing that should raise a red flag is that the document, is signed by, “the representative of Zion, of the 33rd Degree”. The 33rd degree is the highest degree of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, and since this document is signed by a freemason, and since freemasons take blood oaths to “ever conceal, and never reveal any of the secrets” (i.e. they are sworn liars), right off the bat we have reason to be suspicious of anything written therein as lie. And as I documented in paragraph 3 of the section above, What About Bolshevism and Communism?, the jesuits were the authors of Freemasonry, specifically as a cover for the order, when they were expelled from France in 1764 (the same country in which the order was founded; the term freemason actually comes from the french, “frère‐maçon”, which literally means, ‘the sons of light’).

But aside from these immediate connections to the jesuits, one also discovers many other striking parelles. For instance, in Protocol No. 17, we read that the head of the conspirators who authored this document will be, “THE REAL POPE OF THE UNIVERSE, THE PATRIARCH OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHURCH [(i.e. of catholic church, catholic means universal)]”. Of course the implications of this statement, are that the authors of the document believed the pope to be most powerful person in the universe (or else the analogy wouldn’t make sense), and evidently which title they seek (or already posess). But this is only the beginning of the shocking admissions In Protocol No. 15 we read, “Reared on analysis, observation, on delicacies of fine calculation, in this species of skill we have no rivals, any more than we have either in the drawing up of plans of political actions and solidarity. In this respect the Jesuits alone might have compared with us, but we have contrived to discredit them in the eyes of the unthinking mob as an overt organization, while we ourselves all the while have kept our secret organization in the shade.” Since the jesuits have indeed presented themselves “overtly” as a beneficent society giving themselves to humanitarian missions and acts of charity, while keeping their “secret organization in the shade” (one only need to read the Oath of this society (as documented in the library of congress) founded in 1534, nearly 4 centuries before the protocols to see their true diabolical and despotic nature), and since their allegiance is indeed to the pope, it sure sounds like the jesuits speaking in this document. While it’d not be practical to make a full exposition of the many similliarities between their oath and the protocols, I will cite a couple examples stark enough to suffice. For instance, in Protocol No. 1 we read, “The result justifies the means”. In the jesuit oath we read the remarkably familliar credo, “the end justifies the means”.

In Protocol No. 2 we read of a plot to control science and education:

“The intellectuals of the GOYIM will puff themselves up with their knowledges and without any logical verification of them will put into effect all the information available from science…we have persuaded them to accept as the dictates of science (theory). It is with this object in view that we are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories. …our AGENTUR specialists have cunningly pieced together for the purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want….Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism (Evolution), Marxism (Communism), Nietzsche-ism (Socialism)”

And who have been considered the leading men of the sciences from the Renaissance even unto the present day? The following comes from the ex-Jesuit Priest Malachi Martin’s book, The Jesuits (1987), Pg. 29:

“The Jesuits were the first body of Catholic Scholars who became preeminent in secular sciences—mathematics, physics, astronomy, archeology, linguistics, biology, chemistry, zoology, paleography, ethnography, genetics. The list of inventions and scientific discoveries by Jesuits had filled endless numbers of volumes in the most diverse fields—mechanical engineering, hydraulic power, airflight, oceanography, hypnosis, crystals, comparative linguistics, atomic theory, internal medicine, sunspots, hearing aids, alphabets for the deaf and dumb, cartography. The list from which these random samples are taken numbs the mind by its all- inclusive variety. Their manuals, textbooks, treaties, and studies were authoritative in every branch of Catholic and secular learning”. And of course, education was fundamentally transformed especially with the Encyclopdia movements of the 18th century, and which had jesuit educated contributers influencing the movement, especially the jesuit educated voltaire, who, according to the jesuits, “to the end of his days Voltaire felt deep gratitude to the Jesuits who had educated him”. And Even today the jesuits boast of their historic involvement in education (Example 2).

In Protocol No. 12 we read of the plot to control the press, “Let us turn again to the FUTURE OF THE PRINTING PRESS…NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.” And of course control of the press and control of education, are fundamentally one in the same, namely the relay of information to control of the perception of information at which we derive meaning. And there have been many throughout history that have warned about the jesuit control of the press, such as J. Wayne Laurens in his The Crisis: The Enemies of America Unmasked (1855), who wrote on Pg. 267-268, “They [The Jesuits] can control the press in a thousand secret ways. They can write under the signature of “Whig” today, and if it suits their turn, “Tory” tomorrow. They can be democratic today, and aristocrats tomorrow. They can out-American Americans in admiration of American institutions today, and “condemn them as unfit for any people” tomorrow”. And lest it be thought just conjecture, or to have no present reality, one need only note men such as the Knight of Malta and Knight of the Equestrian Order Rupert Murdoch, who “Through his company News Corp, he is the owner of hundreds of local, national, and international publishing outlets around the world”.

In Protocol No. 13 we read, “in securing the opinion of the mob we are only facilitating the working of our machinery”. But long before the protocols were published, men such as Issac Taylor warned that it was the jesuits who would use mob rule to topple nations. In his Layola and Jesuitism (1843), on Pg. 371, we read: “In times gone by, Jesuitism sought to rule
the world by pushing itself near and nearer still to thrones ; or by actually edging itself on to seats of power. But in times to come, as we may imagine, it will seek to compass the same design by shouldering the mob forward in every popular assault upon thrones. So long as monarchies rested solidly in their piaces upon the field of Europe, the Jesuit Society wished to stand upon the same terra firma; but now that this ground trembles beneatb the foot, it will commend itself, upon its own raft, to the mighty deep — the “many waters” — the people !”.

In Protocol No. 17 we read that it’s “no disgrace to be a spy and informer”. In the Jesuit oath we read: “My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a Reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant; and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.” Notice the disdain expresssed towards the Jews here. Now as we touched upon earlier, noone would name themselves in an incriminating document as is the case in the protocols. But it would make sense if you were forging a document in seeking their destruction to name “yourself” in the forged document. And since we see in the jesuit oath that imitating a Jew is the “lowest” degree to one can stoop (and thus actually being a Jew even lower), it’s evident that the Jews are indeed the hated enemies of the order, and therefore coupled with the evidences that have so far been presented, there can be no doubt that they indeed forged this document. Especially when one considers the ramificaitons, that as the chief “enemy” of the Protocols, as expressed in Protocols No. 17, No. 15 as “THE PRIESTHOOD” (Note: protestant churches don’t have priests) and”Catholicism”, the implication is that the power to be embraced for the presserving the values and traditions which the Protcols seek to over is no other than the catholic church! And what a coincidence this isn’t the first time in history the Jesuits have resorted to such cunning to empower the church. According to Lehman in his Behind the dictators, over a hundred years before the Protocols appeared, the Jesuits had forged a near identical document titled The Secrets of the Elders of Bourg-Fontaine to over throw the Jansenists, a french catholic sect that could almost be considered “protestant”, who denied many accapted papal doctrines, were anti-jesuit, and ultimately condemned by the papacy (additional evidence for this can be found in the writtings of Blaise Pascal(1623-1662). But we’re still not at the end of the simillarities. Interestingly enough, if one carefully compares the protocols to the “the grievances” outlined in the Pope Pius The IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864) they will find both have the same ends in mind, chiefly, a universal despotic empire, the repudiation of the notions of liberty of conscious and the sovereignty of nations. That to achieve this physical force is justified; both demand control of the press and education systems; that every ruler and governor owes their allegiance to the respective societies, and that the disobedient should be destroyed.

And the notion that such is the actual origin and intend of the protocols in re-inforced, for instance, by the following statements, supposedly by the same jewish conspirators, relayed by a spy at tone of their meetings, as published in the Catholic Gazette, 1936:

“As long as there remains among the gentiles any moral conception of the social order, and until all faith , patriotism, and dignity are uprooted, our reign over the world shall not come…“We have already fulfilled part of our work, but we cannot yet claim that the whole of our work is done. We have still a long way to go before we can overthrow our main opponent: the Catholic Church…We must always bear in mind that the Catholic Church is the only institution which has stood, and which will, as long as it remains in existence, stand in our way. The Catholic Church, with her methodical work and her edifying and moral teachings, will always keep her children in such a state of mind, as to make them too self-respecting to yield to our domination, and to bow before our future King of Israel…That is why we have been striving to discover the best way of shaking the Catholic Church to her very foundations. We have spread the spirit of revolt and false liberalism among the nations of the Gentiles so as to persuade them away from their faith and even to make them ashamed of professing the precepts of their Religion and obeying the Commandments of their Church. We have brought many of them to boast of being atheists, and more than that, to glory in being descendants of the ape! We have given them new theories, impossible of realisation, such as Communism, Anarchism, and Socialism, without realising that those theories are ours, and that they constitute our most powerful instrument against themselves…We have blackened The Catholic Church with the most ignominious calumnies, we have stained her history and disgraced even her noblest activities. We have imputed to her the wrongs of her enemies, and have thus brought these latter to stand more closely by our side… So much so, that we are now witnessing, to our satisfaction, rebellions against the Church in several countries”.

So we see the catholic church lauding herself in this propaganda supposedly by a bunch of jews in conspiracy against her. And of course the last statement is most ridicuous, indicating the whole diatribe is contrived, as the Catholic Church has disgraced herself with the most ignominious acts, of which one need only Read Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, or study the inquisitions, the lives of the popes, etc. and it be far more substantial to just point her own admissions of such histories than to have to invent calumnies.

According to Lehman, the protocols actually have their origin in France some nine years before (during the Franco-Russian alliance), with the Dreyfus Affair, where the french-Jewish military commander Alfred Dreyfus was accused of treason and conspiracy, which divided france, led to widespread antisemitism, and ultimately an embracing of the Catholic Faith/principles, thus empowering of the catholic church. But some scholars have asserted that the document has its origin all the way back in the 18th century with the Jesuit and founder of the Illuminati, Adam Weishaupt. In Emanuel M. Josephson’s The Federal Reserve Conspiracy & Rockefellers (1968), on Pg. 72, we read: “For the purpose of attempting to create a breach between the Czarist regime and the Royal Dutch Co., there was affected the publication in Russian, and widespread distribution, under the name of a Captain Linus, a notorious forged document labeled Protocols of Zion. The document was a falsified translation from the German teachings of the Jesuit, Adam Weishaupt, written by him as instructions for the trusted members of his Communist organization, the order of Illuminati,..The plot drafted by Jesuit Weishaupt [(who was a jesuit professor of Cannon law)] for world dictatorship was translated in Russian in the name of a Capt. Linus, at the instance of the conspirators, under the title of “The Protocols of Zion,” and broadcast widely by them as the supposed work of mythical and non-existent “Elders of Zion.” The text was faked to create the impression that Jews and Masons were plotting to overthrow the Czarist regime and make themselves absolute, dictatorial rulers of the world. . .Instead, the conspirators succeeded in inciting massacres of Jews in various sections of Russia, and elsewhere.” And as J. Findlater points out in his The Revolutionary Movement: A Diagnosis of his World Disorder (1933) on Pgs. 36-37 (as well as giving several other evidences of Jesuit origin), that the protocols are essentially a word for word repetition of Maurice Joly’s political satire The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1865, which is based on Machiavelli’s Prince (1532), published at the very time the Jesuits were trying to topple Napoleon III using those very methods, and which indeed had been practiced by the jesuits for over a century since their inception, and for which reason they were as an order dissolved by a papal bull (Dominus ac Redemptor, 1773), and as an order expelled from over 80 countries, states, and city-states, including catholic ones.

—

[article: are jews propogating anti jesuit conspiracy theories http://67.225.133.110/~gbpprorg/zioncrimefactory/2011/09/12/are-jews-propagating-anti-jesuit-conspiracy-theories/%5D

[according to Findlater, jesuits treatment of Syllabus in their organ Civilita Cattolica a more exact replicationof the protocols – can be found here? – https://store.keepthefaith.org/church-in-the-19th-century—part-13-of-18—retrenchment—the-syllabus-of-errors%5D

In J.A. Wylie’s The Jesuits: Their Moral Maxims and Plots (1881) we read: “There is another cloud hanging over us, and not us only, but over all Christendom. We refer to the steady growth of Communism, and other forms of political and social revolution… If these Governments will return to their obedience to the See of Rome, the Jesuits will exert themselves to the utmost to extinguish’ Communism, and make all safe and stable around the thrones which it menaces with overthrow. But if these Governments shall maintain their present attitude to the Vatican, if they, persist in declining the concordats and canon law of Rome, they will be left to reckon with the Conununists as best they may. Help from the Papal See they shall have none. Nay, the Jesuits, in the end of the day, will make common cause with Communism, and will use this new-sprung force to wreak their vengeance on those Governments which have lifted up the heel against their liege lord, and obstinately refuse to return to their obedience to a ruler who claims to be the moral and political sovereign of all Christendom, the king of all its kings. They are working all round Europe to bring on confusion, not doubting for a moment that out of this chaos will emerge their long-cherished dream of a Universal Catholic Monarchy…the Papal host, swelled by Communists, atheists, and the multitudinous foes of established order, will open a conflict with [protestant] Christianity and Liberty all round the world… It is not the bodies of its living men merely that the Jesuits will trample into the grave. It is the manhood, the virtue, the patriotism, the piety of the land which he will waste and trample down. All that is lovely and noble and good will wither and die under the sirocco breath of Jesuitism. If then our law cannot or will not give us protection, it becomes only the more our duty, by unmasking the principles and arts of the ” Order,” to do whatever it may be possible to do to bar the entrance into our country of an order of men who are the banded foes of that purity that sits at our hearths, of that liberty that is enshrined in our law, of that holy faith that is taught in our sanctuaries, and of that imperial sway that is exercised from our throne.”–Pgs. 102-104

—-

But in closing, the bottom line is that the Bible prophecy indicates that not the jews, but rather the roman church would reign until the end of time (again refer to article previously linked on using the Bible to Identify Antichrist, see also Dan. 7:21-22, 25-27; 8:23-25). In fact, the Bible actually pronounces curses on the Jews should be they be disobedient, including that they’d have no power, they’d be borrowers instead of lenders (i.e. not bankers), and be given over to their enemies (Deut. 28:44; Lev. 26:33). So since the Jews have rejected their Messiah we can be sure that, as a whole, they’re under these curses. Furthermore, Jesus himself actually indicated even until the close of time, the jews wouldn’t even actually be in control of their own land (Lk. 21:24).

The Case of the Swastika

What happened in the 20th century in Nazi Germany actually sheds a lot of light on the whole “Jewish Question“. But before we elaborate and glean what we may from that history, because there is so much denial today that the jews were really persecuted at all, we shall establish with undeniable evidence, that though the “6 million” figure could very well be an exaggeration; while the holocaust has no doubt, been to one degree or another opportunistically seized upon for financial or other ends; that nonetheless the jews in general, were publicly announced and marked out to be the singular greatest enemy of culture, church, and state, and subsequently persecuted above other races/classes/sects/etc. I have documented below Nazi anti-Jewish propaganda, as well images/footage documenting the anti-jewish atrocities themselves.

To begin with, one need only consult the 25 point Nazi party manifesto, but lest that be thought inauthentic, we still have preserved examples of Nazi Propaganda films from that very time demonizing the Jews (I would add, as may be discerned from facial features, etc. evidently the same race of people that are today called and called themselves “jews”, whether they be of Kzharian descent or not), footage of Jewish Boycotts, marking off the jewish shops with the hexagram, etc, preserved anti-jewish signs and propaganda posters (Ex. 1, Ex. 2, Ex. 3, Ex. 4, Ex. 5, Ex. 6, Ex. 7, Ex. 8, Ex. 9, Ex. 10, Ex. 11, Ex. 12, Ex. 13), etc. And of course, who was blamed for burning the Reichtag, which led to the beginning of the tyranny of the third reich? Under what threat was hitler empowered? Primarily the threat of Communism. And here we find more nazi propaganda pointing to the Jews being behind the the communistic bolshevik revolution, soviet union, stalin, etc (Ex. 1, Ex. 2, Ex. 3, Ex. 4, Ex. 5). And how were the Jews tied to ultimately being behind this communist threat? The spurious (as we proved above) Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

At this point I must inform the reader that the following links contain graphic material. Additionally, not only do we have the testimonies of holocaust survivors (you will notice several of the clips the people only speak in hebrew, and they do not include english subtitles, and therefore cannot reasonably be considered “propaganda for the goyim”, Ex. 1, Ex. 2, Ex. 3, Ex. 4, Ex. 5, Ex. 6) and soldiers describing what they saw and experienced (Ex. 1, Ex. 2, Ex. 3, Ex. 4, Ex. 5, Ex. 6), and the testimony of German Christian Theologians (such as Martin Niemöller), and who helped jews escape (for Example Dietrich Bonhoeffer; refer to his Letters and Papers from Prison, pg. 194, etc.); medical professionals who’ve encountered patients with the tattoos from the camps (such as my friend Eric, a gentile RN BSN from Kentucky); but lest they all be thought “actors; part of the jewish conspiracy”, etc. we actually have graphic photo and video evidence documenting the atrocities. In many the photos below, it will be clear from the facial features, etc. that the victims are those who identify as/are identified as “Jews” (whether they be “real jews” or not; Ex. 1, Ex. 2, Ex. 3, Ex. 4, Ex. 5, Ex. 6, Ex. 7, Ex. 8, Ex. 9, Ex. 10, Ex. 11, Ex. 12, Ex. 13, Ex. 14, Ex. 15, Ex. 16, Ex. 17, Ex. 18, Ex. 19, Ex. 20, Ex. 21, Ex. 22, Ex. 23, Ex. 24, Ex. 25, Ex. 26, Ex. 27, Ex. 28, Ex. 29, Ex. 30, Ex. 31, Ex. 32, Ex. 33, Ex. 34, Ex. 35, Ex. 36, Ex. 37, Ex. 38, Ex. 39, Ex. 40, Ex. 41, Ex. 42, Ex. 43, Ex. 44, Ex. 45, Ex. 46, Ex. 47).

So now that we’ve proven that the Nazi atrocities definitely occurred, and that the conspiracy was against rather than of the Jews, now let’s take a look some not so well known or too often promulgated history, to discover who was ultimately behind the Nazi power, and from whence they got their anti-jewish doctrines originated. To begin, as they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. So before we get to the historical quotes, we shall first establish their veracity through photographs proving the same.

Catholic Bishops giving the Nazi salute in honor of Hitler. Note Joseph Goebbels (far right) and Wilhelm Frick (second from right)

Cardinal Secretary of State, Eugenio Pacelli (later to become Pope Pius XII) signs the Concordat between Nazi Germany and the Vatican at a formal ceremony in Rome on 20 July 1933. Nazi Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen sits at the left, Pacelli in the middle, and the Rudolf Buttmann sits at the right (see also John Cornwell’s Book, *Hitler’s Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII*, 1999).

A Nazi flag flies in front of the Roman Catholic Cologne Cathedral, 1937

Hitler wth Archbishop Cesare Orsenigo, the papal nuncio in Berlin, 1935

Archbishop Cesare Orsenigo, head of the Diplomatic Corps, attending the Nuremburg Party Rally in September 1933.

Hitler leaving the Roman Catholic Marine Church in Wilhelmshaven

Hitler’s Brown Army attending and leaving church services.

Hitler, Nazi Party Rally at Roman Catholic “Church of our Lady” in the background as if it represented the foundation of the party. Photo taken in Nuremberg, Germany (circa 1928)

Hitler and Nazi Officers having a merry roman catholic christMASS

Priests giving the Hitler salute at a Catholic youth rally in the Berlin-Neukölln stadium in August 1933.

A nice catholic mass just for the Nazi’s most brutal savages, the SS.

Welcome Celebration for Roman Catholic Bishop Konrad Graf von Preysing in the Sportpalast, after being selected by Pope Pius the XI to replace Berlin, 8 Sept. 1935

Now to be fair, most of the “protestant” hierarchy also went along with the third reich. But not all, and that’s because they were apostate and unfaithful to their creed, the Bible. But you see the, difference between Catholicism and Protestantism lies in the undeniable similarities between the former and fascism. What is fascism but absolute power vested in one man? and what is Roman Catholicism but absolute power vested in one man (i.e. the Pope)? So if Hitler was a faithful son and servant of the church (which he was and as we shall now prove with historical evidence) then no marvel if the papacy should back him. And it should be surprise that the so-called protestant churches should have been infiltrated by the jesuits, even as they are today.

To begin with, Hitler was raised and educated in Roman Catholic Benedictine Monastary in Lambach, Austria (as is even admitted in Hitler’s Mein Kampf). And it was is in this Abbey, founded in 1056, that Hitler was first introduced to the Hakenkreuz or “hooked cross”, which would become known as the “Swastika”, and adopted by him as the chief Symbol of his Nazi Party (see images of the Swastika in this Abbey here). This symbol, which historically represented the the sun and good fortune, had it’s origin in the orient, and was brought back to europe by the catholic missionaries (just as they’ve filled their cathedrals/churches/services with the symbols from all the various regions pagan religions of antiquity). Furthermore, at the behest of Pope Pius XII a birthday card was sent to Hitler every year (paragraph 45).But now lets get to the historic quotes to further elucidate the papal origins of the third reich:

“It was of interest to me that the Pope said to me on this occasion that Germany must become the sword of the Catholic Church. I remarked that the old Roman Empire of the German nation no longer existed, and that conditions had changed. But he stuck to his words.”-Pope Leo XIII to Kaiser Wilhem II (predecessor of Adolph Hitler), The Kaiser’s Memoirs (1922), Pg. 211

The Third Reich [the nazi regime] is the first power, which not only recognizes, but puts into practice, the high principles of the Papacy”-Franz Von Papen, Der Voelischer Beobachter , Jan. 14, 1934″

“For today Rome considers the Fascist regime the nearest to its dogmas and interests. We have not merely the Reverend Father Coughlin praising Mussolini’s italy as “a Christian democracy”, but Civilta Cattolica, house organ of the jesuits…Fascism is the regime that corresponds most closely to the concepts of the Church of Rome”-Days of our Years by Pierre Van Passen, 1939, Pg. 465

“I have learnt most of all from the Jesuit Order. So far, there has been nothing more imposing on earth than the hierarchal organization of the catholic church. A good part of that organization I have transported direct to my own party”-Adolf Hitler, Hitler M’a Dit, by Hermann Rauschning, 1939, Pg. 266-267, 273″

Hitler Referred to Himmler as “my Ignatius of Loyola” (founder and first Superior General of the Jesuits)-Höhne, Heinz (2001). The Order of the Death’s Head: The Story of Hitler’s SS, Pg. 135

We also know that the Jesuits, in the May 17, 1941 edition of their magazine America, openly voiced their opposition to fighting the Nazi regime, while cursing the principles and government of the American allies, and appealing (like hitler) for the need of a “new world order”, which must come from the catholic church: “How we Catholics have loathed and despised this Lucifer civilizaion [speaking of America], this rationalist creation of those little men who refuse to bend the knee or bow the head in submission to higher authority [speaking of Protestants]. . . Today, American Catholics are being asked to shed their blood for that particular kind of secularist civilization which they have been herocially repudiating for four centuries. This civilization is now called democracy, and the suggestion is being made that we send the Yanks to Europe again to defend it. In reality, is it worth defending? What’s the sum and substance of it all? All the Yanks in America will not save it from disintegration. Unless a miracle occurs, it is doomed—finally and irrevocably doomed. The New Order in Europe will be either a Nazi or a British totalitarianism, or a combination of both . . . American democracy is disintegrating, crumbling from within. Fatigue, disillusionment, disgust, the unbearable tension in society, the fear of war and the fear of bankruptcy, the absence of security, the technological revolution which has gone far beyond the instruments of social control, deep-rooted, anarchistic hatred of a social order, which has too long denied the principle of social justice, the revolt of the masses and the levelling of all values, the absence of any common ethical basis—these are but a few of the multiple factors in the decline which is now upon us . . .Leadership in this crisis will not come from the laity. It will not come from the bottom of the Catholic pyramid. It will come only from the top, from the Hierarchy. The Christian Revolution will begin when we decide to cut loose from the existing social order, rather than be buried with it.”

“The [Nazi ]Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity [i.e. roman catholicism]…It combats the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and around us”-Point 24 of the 25 Laid out by Hitler for the Nazi Party

So now that we’ve seen the roman catholic origins of the third reich, let’s start to uncover the roman catholic root of the reich’s anti-jewish policy. We see this point, officially adopted as one of the principles of the Nazi movement, being expounded upon in Hitler’s Autobiography Mein Kampf where he diagnoses the “Jewish Problem” which would lead to his “Final solution”. But there is question as to whether Mein Kampf was original to Hitler at all. There are some historians, such as Edmund Paris (himself a Roman Catholic),who maintain it wasn’t even Hitler that wrote Mein Kampf, but rather a jesuit priest by the name of Bernhard Staempfle (Secret History of the Jesuits (1983), pg. 138; Leo Lehman, a former Roman Catholic Priest, maintains the same, in his Behind the Dictators (1942), Pg. 26). There’s no reason to doubt this, for we know Staempfle was the chief editorof the anti-jewish daily Miesbacher Anzeiger (along with another roman catholic named Dietrich Eckart).

According to John S. Conway (Professor Emeritus of History at the University of British Columbia), Hitler stated in a conversation with Mueller, Bishop of the Reich: “I am personally convinced of the great power and deep significance of Christianity, and I won’t allow any other religion to be promoted. That is why I have turned away from Ludendorff and that is why I reject that book by Rosenberg. It was written by a Protestant. It is not a Party book. It was not written by him as a Party man. The Protestants can be left to argue with him. As a Catholic I never feel comfortable in the Evangelical Church or its structures. That is why I will have great difficulty if I try to regulate affairs of the Protestant churches. The evangelical people or the Protestants will in any case reject me. But you can be sure: I will protect the rights and freedoms of the churches and not let them be touched, so that you need have no fears about the future of the Church…As for the Jews, I am just carrying on with the same policy which the Catholic church has adopted for fifteen hundred years, when it has regarded the Jews as dangerous and pushed them into ghettos etc., because it knew what the Jews were like. I don’t put race above religion, but I do see the danger in the representatives of this race for Church and State, and perhaps I am doing Christianity a great service.”-The Nazi Persecution of the Churches, by J.S. Conway, Pgs. 25, 26 & 162.

Now notice, not only was hitler anti-jewish, he was also anti protestant (that is those who were actually true to their protestant creeds, not in name only; just as the reich was anti liberal catholics, i.e. those who wanted peace with protestants, etc. and that didn’t believe in the temporal and spiritual power of the pope, etc.). Indeed protestants were among the first to go the concentration camps. As the Roman Catholic author Thomas J. Caughwell points, “All the Protestant clergy of the Cieszyn region of Silesia [Poland, the first country Hitler invaded, 1939] were arrested and sent to the death camps at Mauthausen, Buchenwald, Dachau and Oranienburg” (catholicculture.org). But what about this bit about the anti-jewish policy of the papacy? As strange as it may sound it’s true, and we shall now prove it by looking at the official doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church as established through her Councils, Bulls, and Church Fathers:

“..fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God…the priests who baptize them…and the bishops should strive that, at least for a long time, they do not mingle much with Jews or infidels”-Council of Basel, 20th Session, AD 1435

“Heretics, if they are unwilling to change over to the Catholic Church, are not to have Catholic girls given to them in marriage, nor shall they be given to Jews or heretics, since there can be no community for the faithful with the unfaithful. If parents act against this prohibition, they shall be kept out for five years…If any of the clergy of the Faithful eats with Jews, he shall be kept from communion in order that he be corrected as he should.”-Canons 16, 50, Council of Elvira, AD 309

“Jews, in particular, must not have access to nunneries…Jews may not be judges or tax-gatherers over Christians… From Thursday in Holy Week to the Easter festival, in accordance with an ordinance of the late King Childebert, Jews may not show themselves on streets and public places, because they have done so to insult Christians. Moreover, they must testify respect to all clerics, and must not sit down before priests, unless they are invited to do so…No Christian may partake of meals with Jews under penalty of excommunication.”-Canons 2, 13, 14, 15, Council of Macon, AD 581

“Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord’s Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema [i.e. cursed] from Christ…It is not lawful to receive portions sent from the feasts of Jews or heretics, nor to feast together with them…It is not lawful to receive unleavened bread from the Jews, nor to be partakers of their impiety”-Canon XXIX, XXXVII, XXXVIII, Council of Laodicea, AD 363-364

“…the perfidy of the Jews grow in these matters…they are exhausting the resources of Christians….Christians too, if need be, shall be compelled by ecclesiastical censure, without the possibility of an appeal, to abstain from commerce with them. We enjoin upon princes not to be hostile to Christians on this account, but rather to be zealous in restraining Jews from so great oppression. We decree, under the same penalty, that Jews shall be compelled to make satisfaction to churches for tithes and offerings due to the churches, which the churches were accustomed to receive from Christians for houses and other possessions, before they passed by whatever title to the Jews…A difference of dress distinguishes Jews or Saracens from Christians in some provinces, but in others a certain confusion has developed so that they are indistinguishable. Whence it sometimes happens that by mistake Christians join with Jewish or Saracen women, and Jews or Saracens with christian women. In order that the offence of such a damnable mixing may not spread further, under the excuse of a mistake of this kind, we decree that such persons of either sex, in every christian province and at all times, are to be distinguished in public from other people by the character of their dress…would be too absurd for a blasphemer of Christ to exercise power over Christians. We therefore renew in this canon, on account of the boldness of the offenders, what the council of Toledo providently decreed in this matter : we forbid Jews to be appointed to public offices…”-Canon 67, 68, 69, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215

“…the Church admits and avows the Jewish people to be cursed, because after killing Christ…”-Roman Catholic “Saint” and Church Father, Augustine of Hippo, The Writings Against the Manichaeans and Against the Donatists (AD 397-400), pg. 230

In 1455 Pope Paul IV issued a bull titled Cum nimis absurdum in the which he established ghettos for the Jews, revoked their religious liberties, placed economic and property sanctions on them, and once again making them wear yellow emblems on their clothing to distinguish them from the other citizens (you know, kind of like the Nazis?), stating, “It appears utterly absurd and impermissible that the Jews, whom God has condemned to eternal slavery for their guilt, should enjoy our Christian love”. Then in 1593 Pope Clement the VIII issued a Papal Bull which expelled the Jews from all Papal States except for Rome, Avignon, and Ancona. And of course if you review this timeline during the years of the Holy Roman Empire you will see they were indeed expelled from papal states and countries over and over gain. We also find the nazi notion of “racial hygiene” had its origin with the Limpieza de sangre or “Blood Purity” bylaws of Catholic spain, which condemned “christians” of jewish race, requiring citizens to proof their gentile race, which were approved by a bull of Pope Alexander VI. This is consistent with the Jesuit Theologian Francisco Suarez, who stated in his Tractatus de religione Societatis Jesu that Jewish descent is an impurity of such indelible character that it is sufficient to prevent admission into the Order.

Now what needs to be kept in mind is that the official doctrine of the Catholic Church, known as Papal Infallibility, as set forth in the First Vatican Council, maintains anything decreed by the popes as being “unblemished by any error”. So not only had there doctrines not changed by the time the 20th century rolled around, they’ve still never officially been repudiated. But ironically enough in spite of her blasphemous claims, and admitting her part in the atrocities that took place in Nazi Germany, in 1998 Pope Paul II formally apologized for the papacy’s role in the holocaust (albeit, speaking out of both sides of his mouth, defending Pope Pius XII, and instead blaming it on the “sons and daughters of the church”). But of course this should be considered nothing but meaningless lip service until she actually officially repudiates and changes her doctrines through new bulls, councils, etc. And there have been many researchers, such as William Cooper on Pg. 89 of his Behold a Pale Horse, that have asserted that Pope John Paul II was in fact a chemist and salesperson for IG Farben selling the cyanid, Zyklon B, etc. poison Gases, which were used in the concentration camps. While it must be pointed out that William Cooper did not properly cite his sources, and therefore this information cannot be considered verified, nonetheless, it at least bears mentioning on account of the rest of the evidence we have established. Also if one goes to you the wikipedia page for IG Fargen it does mention his name as being associated with IG Farben, though no details are given.

But it doesn’t end there, it’s been well documented by many authors that after the war was over many of the prominent Nazis were able to escape without prosecution as war criminals through Vatican’s “Ratlines” and ultimately brought into the US under “Operation Paperclip“. This is actually confirmed right on the CIA’s official website which hosts a document published by the CIA officer Philip Agee, et. al. titled “Nazis, Vatican, and the CIA“.

And to bring this all full circle, as the Roman Catholic Archbishop Quigley stated, “Kings and emperors will soon pass away, and the democracy of the United States will take their place…When the United States rules the world, the Catholic Church will rule the world“(The Chicago Tribune, May 5, 1903, as relayed by the Catholic Priest Jeremiah Crowley in The parochial school, a curse to the church, a menace to the nation; an exposé of the parochial school, pg. 362, 1904). And let us ask, does the US in fact rule the world today? Since the US Dollar is the reserve currency of the world, since the US has more military bases around the world than any other country, and since it’s US pop culture with which the world is obsessed and imitates, there can be no question. So since according to the archbishop american rule = catholic rule, and since the nazis were brought to america after ww2 through papal ratlines, and the nazi movement was itself a papal movement, then we see that only one conclusion can be drawn after looking at the several different elements (and fascinatingly enough a proper interpretation of Bible Prophecies given nearly 2000 years ago, when one uses the Bible to interpret it’s own symbols, reinforces this exact same conclusion).

So now that we’ve established Hitler’s Nazi Movement, which he referred to as a “new world order” (Berlin Sports Palace, Jan. 30th, 1941) was ultimately born out of the Roman Catholic Church and her doctrines, which persecuted the jews and taught that the nordic races and their gentile catholic religion were to be supreme, does it make sense that the “new world order” being called for toady, and that’s represented on back of the US dollar $1 bill would be any different (especially in light of all the evidence presented)? Would be “jewish” this time, even though the Catholic church herself stated when the US rules the world the Catholic church would? When once again Jews are being blamed as the cause of societies ills through the extremely popular pro-Trump Qanon movement, as once again communism is indeed over sweeping the world and the jews are being blamed as being the font, just as in Nazi Germany? When Jews are being blamed for spreading the bogus Covid-19 pandemic? Are we so blind and hate-filled that we do not see history repeating itself, which in and of itself confirms all the evidence herein presented? Hitler was seeking to re-establish the Holy Roman Empire. It’s pageantry is clearly roman (Ex. 1, Ex. 2, Ex. 3). They were clearly not seeking to establish a jewish state which, as most jews consider even paintings idols, would never have utlized such symbols, and instead of roman law would have been seeking to establish noachide laws.

[Whatever opinion the Catholic Church may now express about Hitler and his Nazi-Socialism, it stands 100 per cent with him and the other fascist dictators in this avowed objective of destroying the political and social order that came out of the Reformation and substituting therefor an integral, positive-Christian hierarchical confederation of states, similar to that which existed before Protes- tantism disrupted the authoritarian order of things in Central Europe. -pg 21 lehmann]

jesuit origin of racial hygene see pgs 24-25 lehman BTD

nazi jesuit racial hygienist hermann muckermann

[for more hitlers catholic admissions see MeinKampf,p.4.2 P.293.3 P.385.4 P.417.5 P.507.6 P.513.]

[https://vaticanassassins.org/2010/06/29/lah-symbol-of-hitlers-bodyguard-identical-to-ihs-symbol-of-the-jesuit-order/]

[ James Carroll [himself a roman catholic] in “Constantines Sword”, p. 382–383, citing Jesuit scholar John Padberg (“For matters of greater moment: the first thirty Jesuit General Councils”), quotes the text of the 1593-1594 council decree and states that the restriction on Jewish/Muslim converts was limited only to the degree of parentage. Fourteen years later this was extended back to the fifth degree. Over time the restriction relating to Muslim ancestry was dropped. In 1923, the 27th Jesuit council specified “The impediment of origin extends to all who are descended from the Jewish race, unless it is clear that their father, grandfather, and great grandfather have belonged to the Catholic Church.” In 1946, the 29th council dropped the requirement but still called for “cautions to be exercised before admitting a candidate about whom there is some doubt as to the character of his hereditary background.” Maryks interprets the 1593 “Decree de genere” as preventing, despite Loyola’s desires, any Jewish or Muslim conversos and, by extension, any person with Jewish or Muslim ancestry, no matter how distant, from admission to the Society of Jesus, Maryks, p. xxviii link from wiki]

[The Jesuit Order has its “Aryan paragraph” corresponding ex- actly to that of Hitlerism. Its Constitutions contain six impediments against reception into the Order, the first of which is Jewish descent up to the fourth generation. If Jewish descent is discovered after a candidate’s admission, it prevents his “radiation.” This Aryan para- graph first appeared in the statutes of the Order in 1593, was con- firmed in 1608 and is to be found in the latest official edition pub- lished in Florence in 1893. General councils of the order have many times proclaimed that Jewish descent must be considered as “an impurity, scandal, dishonor and infamy.”- Institutum 8. J., p. 278, 302; also Jesuit Lexicon, p. 939]

[Decree de genere 1593 -jesuit anti jewish]

[The Swastikas of Lambach Abbey – http://tkparadosis.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-swastikas-of-lambach-abbey.html]

protestants bar nazi church rule – [https://www.nytimes.com/1933/05/28/archives/protestants-bar-nazi-church-rule-elect-own-leader-name-dr-von.html]

[chick – holocoust or inquisition? – https://www.chick.com/battle-cry/article?id=Hitlers-Death-Camps-Holocaust-or-Inquisition%5D

[holocaust memorials take on protocols – https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion%5D

Jack Chick’s Smokescreens – contains many hitler quotes, including on catholic = nazi jewish policy – https://web.archive.org/web/20150326021531/http://seawaves.us/na/web4/smoke.html

bring out fact hitler’s attempt to establish holy roman empire, point out simillair symbols, pomp & circumstance, etc.

[https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/04/29/vatican-pope-pius-records-holocaust/]

[more on jesuit social justice – http://thegreatcontroversy.info/social-justice.html%5D

The Proverbial “Nail in The Coffin”

Now, for my non-Christian readers, in order to proceed to our final verdict, we must establish that the Bible (both old and new testaments), have proven to be exactly what it claims, the Preserved, Inspired, and Infallible Word of God (Ps. 12:6-7; Mt. 4:4; 2 Tim. 3:16; etc.) through archaeology (here one will find a whole website dedicated to documenting discoveries pertaining to both the old and new testaments, and here another, here documentation of Ron Wyatt’s discovery of the Ark of the Covenant and Crucifixion site of Jesus of Nazareth, Evidence he rose from the dead; see also W. Keller’s Bible as History (1955), etc.), secular histories, and the perfect track record of innumerable extremely detailed prophecies (Jesus fulfilled over 300 prophecies, naming the year and town he’d be born in, the manner of betrayal and death he’d experience, the destruction of the temple and razing of Jerusalem that’d follow by the romans, etc. Over 14 prophecies identifying the Roman Catholic Church as Antichrist, Over 50 detailed prophecies concerning the end of the world, which are finally coalescing and meeting a remarkable fulfillment all around us, etc.). And through the thousands of extant manuscripts of the new testament, we know that it’s true to the original, and so likewise, the old testament honestly preserved throughout history via the discoveries such as the dead sea scrolls. And as much being the case, what the Bible has to say concerning these matters not only needs to at least be considered, is actually the surest witness we have.

Most who who hold to the theory that the jews rule the world today also hold to the theory that they’re actually jews (i.e. descendants of jacob) but are actually of Ashkenazi of Khazarian (Turikish), or other ancestry. Now if this is true, that means from the onset, the notion that the “jews” rule the world is a self-defeating assertion, since according to this theory, jews don’t actually rule the world, but rather those of another race pretending to be the descendants of Abraham, with whom God made covenant.

But even if we define a “jew” by religion rather than race, since they de facto reject Jesus as their Messiah (or transliterated from the greek of the New Testament, “Christ” (and from where his followers get the name “Christian”)), not hearkening unto “that Prophet like unto Moses” (Deut. 18:15), they are thus under the curses of Deut 28 (for not hearkening unto Him, v. 45), which include: “And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known…And among these nations shalt thou find no ease, neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest: but the Lord shall give thee there a trembling heart, and failing of eyes, and sorrow of mind…The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low. He shall lend to thee, and thou shalt not lend to him: he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail…Therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies which the Lord shall send against thee, in hunger, and in thirst, and in nakedness, and in want of all things: and he shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck, until he have destroyed thee“ (vv. 64-65; 43-44, 48). And obviously, as the ashkenazi-khazar “jews” are the ones who have been scattered among the nations, would it not be inconsistent to believe they’d only fall under first curses outlined in scriptures quoted above, but not the latter?

Additionally, the Bible explicitly identifies the last world kingdom as Roman (4 world kingdoms outlined in in Dan. Ch’s 2, 7, 8 leading to the end of the world (vv. 7:17-18; 2:44-45); the 1st being identified by the Bible itself as Babylon (8:1; 2:37-39), the 2nd as Media-Persia (8:20), the 3rd Grecian (8:21), and the 4th Roman (Lk. 2:1), and the beast in Rev. 13 being exactly a conglomeration of these 4 beasts (v. 2), of which it says “power was given him over all kindreds, tongues and nations.”, v. 7; and which power it says it received from the kingdom that satan used to try and murder Christ at birth, v.2; 12:1-5; i.e. through Herod of Rome (Mt. 2); and which is in fact the very claim of origin of power made of the Roman Catholic Church in spite of herself; and she alone fulfilling the at least 14 other additional prophecies of antichrist) rather than a jewish one. And lest one assert, the “jews” are merely using papacy as a cover, we know that since Heb. 6:18 which states it’s impossible for God to “lie” (Strong’s #G5574, pseudomai, “to utter an untruth” or “deceive by falsehood”), and thus this cannot be so, for it’d make God an accomplice in their deception by fingering when the roman papacy when “it’s really the jews behind the papacy”.

And fascinatingly enough, the Word of God, in addition to stating it’s the Roman Papacy that “which reigneth over the kings of the earth” (Rev. 17:18), the Bible tells us that the Jews, unto the end of time, the jews would not even be sovereign over there own land, but would be “trodden down by gentiles” (Lk. 21:24). Is there evidence today which bears this out? The first thing to note is that following the total destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 the land laid barren until around AD 117-136 when it was rebuilt by the romans from the ground up and renamed “Aelia Capitolina” and then “Palistina” after one of the Jews most infamous foes, the philistines. Over the next few centuries Jerusalem would be conquered and re-conquered by the Byzantines, Persians, etc. and then eventually the Arabs. Fast forward to the 12th century and the papacy officially establishes the crusades to regain “The Holy Land” for herself, and which resulted in the pope’s “Kingdom of Jerusalem“. Fast forward another 920 years, and most people today look at the “modern” state of Israel as “jewish”. But is this in actuality so? Or does the papacy still secretly control Jerusalem, as the Bible would implicate? The first thing we’ll consider, to keep in the back of our minds while we examine the rest of the evidence that shall be presented, is that according to William Guy Carr, author, historian, and decorated Commander of the Canaadian Royal Navy (who died under suspicious circumstances), he became aware of a blueprint outlined by Albert Pike (an author, jurist, confederate general, occultist, and 33 degree Feemason who’s most responsible for transforming Masonry into what it is today) ito to Giuseppi Mazzini (revolutionary and Masonic Grand Master of the Masonic Grand Orient of Italy) in August 15 of 1871, through a Roman Catholic Cardinal and Archbishop named José María Caro Rodríguez, and that was according to him in 1925 in the British Museum (educated at the Jesuit Pontifical Gregorian University). This blueprint described three world wars that must take place to usher in a luciferian new world order. The second, which concerns our subject, states, “The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine…”. One thing is for sure, the first two wars definitely went according to this outline (and the third seems to be shaping up accordingly as well, especially after 9/11, etc.). Another thing that is for sure is that the Jesuits (Specifically Robert Bellarmine and Francisco Ribera) created an alternate form of prophetic interpretation, designed to destroy the protestant reformation which was based on the notion that the papacy is the antchrist foretold in scripture, that required instead a “devil incarnate” individual who’d sit in a literal reubilt temple in Jerusalem and start back up the sacrificial system of the jews, instead of the Biblical interpretation (for more on this refer to the following program). Now in order to fulfill this prophecy to “validate” it’s interpretation and seal the world in this deception, they’d obviously first need control over Jerusalem. And we know for sure that result of WW2 has been a continued mass exodus of Jews back to “the holy land” (which is another element of crafting these endtime prophetic fulfillments, see Ezekiel 36:19-24, etc.). And so since this information was ultimately made public by a jesuit prelate definitely further validates it’s veracity.

And of course Israel’s declaration of “independence” in 1948 was declared by David Ben-Gurion, a member of the freemasonic B’nai B’rith and recipient of their Presidential Gold Medal Award. And, tying this to the present day, one thing we know that according to the Grove Masonic Lodge’s website, Benjamin Netanyahu, the current prime minister of Israel, is a Freemason. This is the first evidence that present day Israel is still run by Rome, since as has already been mentioned, freemasonry is ultimately headed by jesuits. Next we shall note that the national flag of Israel features the very un-jewish, ancient, pagan, fertility and witchcraft symbol known as the hexagram, which can be found all over the more ancient roman catholic religious structures all over the world, such as St. Patrick’s Cathedral (the most powerful catholic enclave in the world, second only to vatican city itself in rome), the Church of Saint Nicholas in Valencia, the cathedral of Basel, Switzerland, the Santa Croce church of Florence Italy, the Abbey of Alet Les-Bains in France, inside the Sheffield Cathedral of London, the former roman catholic Lincoln cathedral in england, the Cathedral of Mazatlan, Mexico, etc. and also on the very mitres of the popes. And so since curses in witchcraft are also known as a “hex” (due to the hexagram which accompanies the spells) on people, should it be any surprise that with a papal control of Israel they’d choose the Hex as the chief representative symbol, since we’ve proven they ultimately hate the jews?

And we don’t have need to conjecture, current events prove the Bible reliable. It’s no secret that there have been several joint agreements between Israel and the Vatican. According to the Catholic University Law Review, in 1904, “Theodore Herzl, the founder of political Zionism, met with Pope Pius X to ask for
his support for the Zionist enterprise”, though spurning the request, the pope did indicate right to the land, stating, “The ground of Jerusalem, if it were not always sacred, has been sanctified by the life of Jesus Christ.” Subsewuently “Comprehensive Agreement Between the Holy See and the State of Palestine“, and also the “Fundamental Agreement Between the Holy See and the State of Israel“) which, for instance, granted “Custody of the Holy Land” to the catholic “the Order of Friars Minor”. And since then we’ve seen headlines, such as this one from the Jerusalem Post, reading, “[President Shimon] Peres wants to yield sites to Vatican“.

created to fulfil jesuits futurist proph.

[]

]

As relayed by the Canada Council Award winning author, Publicist, Veteran, and anti-modern state of Israel whistleblower Barry Chamish,

[http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2015/08/barry-chamish-e-mail-august-12-2015.html]

[https://cruxnow.com/church/2014/09/peres-pope-francis-is-only-leader-respected-enough-to-end-todays-wars/]

[https://israelbehindthenews.com/1997/09/22/the-vaticans-jerusalem-agenda/]

See Also Pgs. 375-406-412 Vatican Assasins Slideshow

bunch of barry chamish quotes – http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2009/01/barry-chamishs-revelations-and.html

Closing Thoughts

In closing this section, let us remind ourselves that the Founding Father’s of the 1st nation to truly Champion Liberty (America), warned against a jesuit/catholic plot to overthrow it from it’s inception, not a jewish one (and what would the jew have to gain from such a plot anyway, when America was such a safe haven for the often persecuted jew, that they were able to for once able to innovate and thrive in business unmolested). Furthermore, hundreds of honest authors, of all walks of life (including ex-jesuits, ex-nuns, and ex catholic-priests), have bequeathed to us a history spanning over 400 years, having come to the same conclusions. I challenge anyone to produce such a body of evidence, spanning as far back in history, implicating the jew.

show history of roman catholic persecution of jews (there’s no history of jews persecuting catholics)

link papal terror today; fasces symbolism in america, proof of america working with nazis (CIA), etc. can it be a coincidence that once more jews being blamed?

“[Wherever] a totalitarian movement erupts, whether Communist or Nazi [Fascist], a Jesuit can be found in the role of ‘adviser’ or leader; in Cuba [it was] [Jesuit-trained] Castro’s ‘Father’ Armando Llorente…” – Emanuel M. Josephson (American physician and historian)

“Why would the Jesuits use their implacable enemy, the Jews to further their designs for world dominion? The Jesuits never do anything out in the open where they can be exposed. If they are recognized as then culprits, they will be blamed and suffer the consequences, but if they can use someone else as the ’cause of the world’s problem’, especially an enemy they can destroy in the process, then they have simultaneously accomplished two of their objectives. The Jewish people are the perfect scapegoat. Since the Rothschilds are Jesuit agents operating under a Jewish cover, using them [i.e., the Rosthschilds] in forming the Illuminati back in 1776 effectively throws onus of this conspiracy on the Jews. The Rothschilds are certainly not the only Jesuit agents that operate under a Jewish front.”-William Josiah Sutton (Author of The New Age Movement and Illuminati 666)

“[Jesuit Adam] Weishaupt established the [modern version of the] Illuminati specifically to be a front organization behind which the Jesuits could hide. After being [formally] ablished by [Pope] Clement XIV in 1773, the Jesuits used the Illuminati and other organizations to carry out their operations. Thus, the front organizations would be blamed for the troube caused by the Jesuits”-Bill Hughes (Author of the Secret Terrorists and the Enemy Unmasked)

Even today you will see many jews in places of prominence for instance your mnuchin’s weinsteins, soros’ kissinger’s etc. The bottom line, and as has been demonstrated in this article, the roman church reigns over the kings of the earth, just as the Bible says. And this has all been done by design, history is literally repeating itself.

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZgOgyFfyxM]

The problem with the first 5 groups mentioned our list of potential culprits is, of course, that these are extremely vague and ambiguous generalized terms with no traceable history or doctrines associated with them. Now when one realizes, for instance that the Federal Reserve is not part of the U.S. Government, and that private central banks are controlling the printing of the currencies of the world, there can be no question the bankers have a prominent role. But who are they? What are their origins of this group? What are the determining factors for the successive generations of bankers? From whence are they drawn?

The system which rules the world today can best be likened to an octopus, which while seemingly being made up of many separate and unrelated groups and individuals, are actually one body consisting of many different “tentacles”. Not only is such a system of organizational hierarchy necessary for world domination, it also serves to create confusion so that the real culprits can remain in the shadows. In fact disinformation is constantly being promulgated across the web not only through ignorant people, but even intentionally by government agencies for instance, so as to muddy the waters and deter the real culprits from being exposed. This is not my opinion, there is much evidence that this is actually taking place, see link here.

While in this sense it would seem an ‘open’ internet is not very conducive to their goals, I’m sure the only reason it hasn’t been more censored, or shut down altogether at this point, is due to to profits that have and are being made, as they’ve been able to turn this very “truth movement” itself into an industry. That being said, however, content which exposes the true hand beyond all of this, is constantly disappearing from the web, and the grip is tightening as legislation such as CISPA better known as The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, are being passed. I honestly cannot count how many times when reviewing articles I’ve written in the most recent past, I find that the links I provided are no longer valid: the site is no longer online, the content was ‘removed by user’, contained a ‘copyright infringement’, the ‘channel no longer exists’, etc.

While one of the popular topics circulating the web today, is for instance, that the Holocaust was a giant hoax purported by the Jews to create sympathy and garnish money, to the well read historian, there is no question that throughout history the Jews have been one of the most persecuted peoples throughout history across the world. This was especially true throughout the ancient world, the Jews being surrounded by polytheists and savage pagans who engaged in all sorts of rituals and superstitions, often involving idolatry, sex, and human sacrifice, the Jews being monotheistic, worshiping the God of spirit, and having a moral code, generally seeking to being separate culturally as well as religiously, and unwilling to compromise.

At this point I should make clear my race and religion just to set the record straight. I’m a white Anglo-Saxon, Bible believing, non-denominational Christian. And thus it should be understood that I have no “dogs in the race” on the grounds of race/religion. And lest I be accused of being biased because of the Hebrew roots of my Faith, I shall refer to what the apostle Paul wrote regarding the Jews in Romans 11:28, “they are enemies for your sakes”. Indeed the Jews in rejecting the messiah persecute Christians. My purpose in writing this is because God has given me insight and understanding of the truth, and as the name of my blog indicates, it’s my honor and duty before God, to contend for as much.

It’s become quite fashionable to blame the Jew. And as the saying goes, those who don’t study history are doomed to repeat it. The writing is on the wall. If people don’t wake up to the real “puppet masters” at the “top of the pyramid”, the Jews are once again going to be persecuted and killed in mass, even here in America, where they historically have been protected and allowed to prosper and have a safe haven from their historic persecutions.

Now if it was truly the Jews were truly behind the New World Order, then that would be one thing, but as I will prove beyond any shadow of a doubt in this article, from numerous angles, this is clearly not the case, which is why it grieves my heart to see such hatred for this people, knowing the bloodshed which will eventually ensue against these largely innocent people, if the real powers that be have their way.

—-

3) People don’t read the Bible. This ties into point number 1 and 2 and is the most crucial element. In actuality this proves the Bibles authenticity, which states “And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie” -2 Thessalonians. 2:10-11. And indeed without the light of Christ and the divine teaching and guidance from above, it’s impossible to make out the truth and see through the smoke, mirrors, and confusion. Not only does the Bible contain a historic record of the Jews history spanning thousands of years, it also: A) illuminates the spiritual dimension. As God’s chosen people through whom he brought the Savior of the World; and the race through which he worked through for the first few thousand years of human history; and still having promises from God eventually to be fulfilled; Satan, who is the ultimate ruler of the world in this present age (2 Cor. 4:4), hates the Jews with an utter hatred and uses wicked men to persecute them. B) The Bible also tells us who the rulers of the world are not. The Jews do not even run Jerusalem today, how could they run the world? What was to become the fate of the Jews was actually foretold by Jesus himself over two thousand years ago, it’s recorded in Luke 21:24, “And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.” The first half of this prophecy is verified by an honest survey of history, and the fact that they’re not even in control of their own land today evidenced by many facts: for instance, they only occupy a portion of the land that promised to them; the occult symbol that occupies their national flag; the fact that Jerusalem was conquered by papal crusades in the 12th to 13th centuries. etc. C) The Bible unmistakably identifies who’s actually behind the system that “reigneth over the kings of the earth”through several prophecies which when considered collectively render it statistically impossible for them to be fulfilled by any other institution.

The above points will be elaborated on to one extent or another below. Also bear in mind that the Jews as a whole reject the Bible, save the Tanakh (first several books), so obviously they did not ‘doctor’ the prophecies therein to ‘pass the buck’. And when their messiah was present they proclaimed, as recorded in John 19:15, “We have no king but Caesar“. This will become prophetically significant as we unravel who truly rules the world today.

So Who is ‘Pulling The Strings’?

As the saying goes ‘All roads lead to Rome’. Ultimately, it’s the JESUIT ORDER and the other various knighthoods of THE ROMAN CATHOLIC PAPACY that are behind all of these organizations and individuals mentioned above.

Regarding the prophetic statement of the Jews above “We have no king but Caesar”, in his book “The Two Babylon’s”, written in 1858, Alexander Hislop proves that pagan Rome became papal Rome.

There is really so much that could be said here, so many angles which could be elaborated on and so much proof, in fact to the extent an entire book could be written on these matters alone. My purpose however is only to provide enough information to as to present sufficient evidence that it should satisfy set the record straight for those who are truly interested in knowing the truth.

The Main Evidence

1) Bible Prophecy. For brevity and simplicity sake, I shall refer the reader to the article I’ve written on this subject,”Using the Bible to Identify Antichrist“.

So is it any wonder that the church of Rome did everything in her power to keep the scriptures out of the hands of the common man? She kept the scriptures restricted only to the hypocrite and rich priests for over a thousand year until by the providence of God the printing press was given to man so that books could be produced for quicker and cheaper and thus more people could afford them, that’s when Rome started burning the books. Then she would go on to murder as “heretics” all the Bible translators for giving people to “unlearned” the Holy scriptures in the “vulgar” common tongue (language other than Latin), she then attempted to stop the work of the greatest translation of Bible ever to occur via her gunpowder plot. But by the providence of God, He made sure that despite all the plots of the devil using wicked men to keep humanity in the dark, men would have access to the scriptures. So when she realized she couldn’t destroy the Bible, she decided to release her own counterfeit Bibles based on her counter-reformation Westcott & Hort-Pro-Jerome’s Latin Vulgate texts, under the guise of being easier to read.

For more information I’d recommend checking out the book ‘Rome’s Policy Towards The Bible: Papal Efforts to Suppress The Scriptures in the Last Five Centuries Exposed’ by “An American Citizen”, 1844, available to read at that link.

2) An Appeal to History. Once again, I shall refer the reader to my post “Books on Romanism, Etc.” which contains a list of over 120 titles spanning over 400 years proving from the church of Rome’s own doctrines her conspiracy, and that she was behind all of the dictators, wars, and even the major current events over the last 200 years in America. This list is most certainly not exhaustive, but merely represents titles which I’ve come across in my studies. Most of these titles can be found online and read at your convenience at archive.org.

Her Own Doctrine

If that weren’t enough, one really only needs to start investigating her own claims of authority from the Popes, Church Fathers, and Jesuit Oath to see her aims which confirm she’s the chief conspirator.

“I…declare and swear that His Holiness, the Pope…hath power to depose heretical Kings, Princes, States, Commonwealths, and Governments, and they may be safely destroyed…. I do now denounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or State, named Protestant or Liberal, or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates or officers….Go ye, then, into all the world and take possession of all lands in the name of the Pope. He who will not accept him as the Vicar of Jesus and his Vice-Regent on earth, let him be accursed and exterminated.”-Jesuit Extreme Oath of Induction as recorded in the Journals of the 62nd Congress, 3rd Session, of the United States Congressional Record (House Calendar No. 397, Report No. 1523, 15 February, 1913, pp. 3215-3216

“In the coronation of all popes — including Pius XII, on March 12, 1939 — the tiara is placed on the candidate’s head with the words: “Receive the tiara adorned with three crowns and know that thou art Father of princes and kings, Ruler of the world, Vicar of our Savior Jesus Christ.” If this phraseology had not been sanctified by long usage, it would not have been coined in this generation to express the relation of the pope to the political and social order; but it would not have been created in the first place if it had not meant then what it says — Ruler of the world.”-Paul Hutchinson and Winfred E. Garrison, 20 Centuries of Christianity: A Concise History (1st ed.), p. 120. © 1959

“… the hand of God, who guides the course of history, has set down the Chair of His Vicar on earth, in this city of Rome which, from being the capital of the wonderful Roman Empire, was made by Him the capital of the whole world, because He made it the seat of a sovereignty which, since it extends beyond the confines of nations and states, embraces within itself all the peoples of the whole world. The very origin and divine nature of this sovereignty demands, the inviolable rights of conscience of millions of the fa8ithful of the whole world demand that this sacred sovereignty must not be, neither must it ever appear to be, subject to any human authority or law whatsoever, even though that law be one which proclaims certain guaranties for the liberty of the Roman Pontiff. -Pope Pius XI, Encyclical Letter UBI ARCANO DEI CONSILIO (On the Peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ), December 23, 1922.

“The Roman Pontiff, successor of the blessed Peter, and the vicar of Jesus Christ, keeper of the keys of the heavenly Kingdom, of all regions of the world, and of all of the nations and those who dwell in them”–Bullarium Patronatus Portugalliae Regum In Ecclesiis Africae, Asiae, Atque Oceaniae, …, Volume 1 (1171-1600), curante Levy Maria Jordão, 1868, pgs. 8 & 12.

“Tell us we are Catholics first and Americans or Englishmen afterwards; of course we are. Tell us, in the conflict between the church and the civil government we take the side of the church; of course we do. Why, if the government of the United States were at war with the church, we would say tomorrow, to hell with the government of the United States; and if the church and all the governments of the world were at war, we would say, to hell with all the governments of the world. * * * Why is it that in this country where we have only seven per cent of the population, the Catholic church is so much feared? She is loved by all her children and feared by everybody. Why is it the Pope has such tremendous power? Why, the Pope is the ruler of the world. All the emperors, all the kings, all the princes, all the presidents of the world are as these altar boys of mine. The Pope is the ruler of the world.“–The Western Watchman, a paper published in St. Louis by Father D. S. Phelan, June 27th, 1912.

See the this link for many more historic claims of hers, including that the popes are actually God and Jesus Christ himself.

Also be sure to check out what Abraham Lincoln, Napoleon, Adolph Hitler, and other notable leaders had to say about the Church of Rome and her Jesuit order at my post Historic Quotes on the Jesuits, as well as the rest of the Extreme Jesuit Oath, as documented in the Library of Congress.

Another excellent book to consult for historic quotes regarding Rome’s doctrine and conspiracies, especially as it pertains to the United States of America, is ex-catholic priest of 25 years, Charles Chiniquy’s book written in 1886, “50 Years in the Church of Rome” particularly pages 668-689.

A History of Jewish Persecution

INCLUDE QUOTES OF PAPACY BEING ANTIJEWISH, 3RD REICH PUTTING IN PRACTICE CATHOLIC DOCTRINE, ETEC. (BEHIND THE DICTOATSPART 10 FRIESS)

Also consider the below timeline, outlining the Church of Rome’s bloody history of Jewish persecution :

1096 Roman Catholic crusaders slaughter half the Jews in Worms, Germany.

1099 Roman Catholic crusaders massacre 70,000 Muslims and Jews when they capture Jerusalem.

1236 Roman Catholic crusaders slaughter Jews in the Anjou and Poitou regions of western France. The Catholic crusaders trample to death under their horses 3000 Jews who refuse baptism.

1243 Roman Catholic mobs burn alive all the Jews in Berlitz, Germany (near Berlin).

1298 Roman Catholic mobs burn alive all Jews in Rottingen, Germany.

April 26, 1349 Roman Catholic mobs burn to death all Jews in Germersheim, Germany.

1348 – 1349 The Jews are blamed for the bubonic plague. Author Dave Hunt tells us, “Accused of causing the ‘Black Death’ Jews were rounded up [by Roman Catholic mobs] and hanged, burned, and drowned by the thousands in revenge.”

1389 Roman Catholic mobs murder 3000 Jews in Prague when they refuse to be baptized.

Circa 1938 – 1945 Catholic dictators such as Adolf Hitler and Monsignor Tiso slaughter approximately six million Jews in Europe prior to and during World War 2.

Source: Amazingdiscoveries.org

Additional Evidence Jews Don’t Even Run Israel Today

What’s the centerpiece today of Jerusalem? The Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Anyone who knows anything about symbolism, and the scriptures, will know that this is a roman catholic church by viewing the picture linked above. Not only is there babies depicted as angels with wings (which is totally unbiblical and of the roman catholic tradition), there is of course all the catholic candles, crosses, gold and silver, “Jesus” with long hair depicted with a sun disk around his head, a statue of the virgin mary, etc. Furthermore they proclaim this is the crucifixion site of Christ, but that’s not so. As a matter of fact Archaeologist Ron Wyatt found the actual Crucifixion site buried beneath a garbage dump, including the plugged holes in the ground which held the three crosses, the carvings in the Golgotha mountain behind them which held the signs of title/reason for execution, and the fractured earth which actually contained the dried blood of Christ, which when was examined in the laboratory contained half the human-chromosome count (having only one human parent, Mary). For more information on that find see this 5-Part article and check out this documentary for more info.

Vatican Wealth

The Vatican Billions by Avro Manhattan, 1983

Documentary, Vatican: Owner of World’s Biggest Banks and Top Global Companies

Documentary, Behind the Closed Doors of the Vatican

Article, Vatican Wealthiest Institution in the World

Knights Templars and International Banking’s Origins

Concluding Misc. Information and Links

Photographic evidence Proving it was the Church of Rome behind Adolph Hitler (also be sure to check out L.H. Lehman’s book from 1942 “Behind the Dictators” as well as John Cromwell’s “Hitler’s Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII” written in 2008.)

The Aggressive Intentions of the Papacy

The Auschwitz Album: Proof of Jesuit Papacy’s SS-led Eurasian Jewish Holocaust

The Bloody History of Papal Rome-Quotes

Pope Claims to be God

The Black Pope: The Most Powerful Man on Earth

The Pale of Permanent Jewish Settlement: Introduction and Historical Context

A Brief Historical Survey of Jewish Persecution

The Mythos Mafia: The Papal Bloodlines of the Jesuits

The Two Babylons, a lecture by Jim Arrabito, Part 1 of 4

Words of The Beast

All Seeing Eye of “Illuminati” used in Catholic Churches (examine the images at article, be careful of information, right of the bat the person who wrote it is claiming Paul was the founder of Christianity and a false apostle, which is obviously false).

All Seeing Eye in Roman Church (Another Pic)

ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT JESUIT SECRET SHADOWY PAPAL BLOODLINES

The Jesuit Vatican New World Order

THE REAL 13 ZOROASTRIAN BLOODLINES OF THE ILLUMINATI

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=WDER83rW4oE]

[rockefellars not jewish https://www.quora.com/Was-David-Rockefeller-Jewish%5D

[***include documentation of papacy’s hatred against jews, phelps, etc.***]

[***also deal with jesuit element in bolshevism***]

[[add section proving Bible states papacy rules over earth, pictures of world leaders bowing to her, papal U.N connection, Vatican billions, etc. jews don’t rule their own land, scritptural bottom line, olso accords, etc.]]

[https://www.alemattec.com/The%20Knights%20of%20Malta%20through%20the%20Rothschilds%20whose%20name%20means%20%27red%20shield%20%20–%20%20with%20the%20red%20sign%27%20are%20the%20Guardians%20of%20The%20Vatican%20Treasury.htm]

Contending for The Faith

Which was once delivered unto the saints-Jude 1:3

Do The Jews Run The World?

Who are were the First Bankers, and who are the Rothschilds?

What about Bolshevism and communism?

Jewish or Jesuit Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion?

The Case of the Swastika

The Proverbial “Nail in The Coffin”

Closing Thoughts

So Who is ‘Pulling The Strings’?

The Main Evidence

Her Own Doctrine

A History of Jewish Persecution

Additional Evidence Jews Don’t Even Run Israel Today

Vatican Wealth

Concluding Misc. Information and Links

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=WDER83rW4oE]

5 thoughts on “Do The Jews Run The World?”

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Who are were the First Bankers, and who are the Rothschilds?

What about Bolshevism and communism?

Jewish or Jesuit Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion?

The Case of the Swastika

The Proverbial “Nail in The Coffin”

Closing Thoughts

So Who is ‘Pulling The Strings’?

The Main Evidence

Her Own Doctrine

A History of Jewish Persecution

Additional Evidence Jews Don’t Even Run Israel Today

Vatican Wealth

Concluding Misc. Information and Links

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=WDER83rW4oE]

Share this:

5 thoughts on “Do The Jews Run The World?”

Leave a comment Cancel reply